

#Iobserve rating and michigan professional
Manage research data carefully to protect subject confidentialityįederal regulations define a human subject as a "living individual about whom an investigator (whether professional or student) conducting research: (i) obtains information or biospecimens through intervention or interaction with an individual, and uses, studies, or analyzes the information or biospecimens or (ii) obtains, uses, studies, analyzes, or generates identifiable private information or identifiable biospecimens." ~ 45 CFR 46.102.Report all unanticipated problems or serious adverse events involving risks to human participants as soon as possible.Submit scheduled continuing review reports to the IRB as required, and prior to the protocol expiration date.Submit amendments before initiating changes to the approved protocol.Conduct the research in accordance with the approved protocol.Complete the required ethical and regulatory training for the conduct of human research (see HRPP Education Resources - PEERRS).The faculty advisor shares responsibility with the student for the ethical conduct of the research ( see Resources below). Designate a faculty advisor on the IRB application for research conducted by students.Apply for IRB approval or determination of exemption before conducting any research with human participants or their personally identifiable data via U-M's eResearch Regulatory Management system.In compliance with federal regulations, state laws, and university policy, the investigator's key responsibilities are to: Researchers at U-M are responsible for the ethical conduct of research with human participants. Issue exempt determinations and other decisions.Manage communications between the research team and the IRB reviewer.Conduct administrative review of new submissions.As a researcher, most of your interaction with the IRB is through the staff as they assist you with questions about IRB process and regulatory requirements, as well as provide educational programming to the research community. The IRB-HSBS regulatory compliance staff supports the operations of the two boards. Each board includes faculty representatives from U-M Dearborn and U-M Flint. Designated IRB members also conduct expedited review of applications on a rolling basis.

and Thad Polk, Ph.D., and Vice Chairs Rob Hymes, Ph.D. and Kazuko Hiramatsu, Ph.D. The IRB-HSBS consists of two (2) boards led by the IRB Co-Chairs Riann Palmieri-Smith, Ph.D. Assists researchers in the design and conduct of sound research in support of U-M's mission to develop and disseminate new knowledge in the public interest.Reviews and oversees research to ensure that it meets ethical principles and complies with federal regulations, state laws, and university policies (see HRPP Policies).This information will be referenced in these web pages or you can contact the staff liaison for your unit if you have questions about Flint or Dearborn requirements. The Health Sciences and Behavioral Sciences Institutional Review Board (IRB-HSBS) is responsible for protecting the rights and welfare of human participants in research conducted by faculty, staff and students affiliated with the University of Michigan – Ann Arbor Campus as well as the Dearborn and Flint Campuses (see list of supported units). Although most IRB review practices are the same for the three campuses, there may be some requirements unique to Flint or Dearborn (e.g., procedures for use of subject pools, specific document templates, or academic program required information for research applications). About the Health Sciences and Behavioral Sciences IRB (IRB-HSBS)
